Search for: "EA v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
The outbreak strain was not identified in any of the other samples collected during this EA, although other pathogens of public health significance were detected. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 12:25 pm
However, in Commission scolaire de Laval v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
The State invited her to be director in large schools in the central region of Porto Alegre (near where we lived), but she also never accepted. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 3:15 am
RT @CJPiovesan: Honoured to be announced by @NavdeepSBains as one of six innovation experts to host roundtable discussions with Canadians i… 2018-08-05 Government of Canada selects innovation experts to lead national consultation on digital and data transformation -… https://t.co/WAZbiSWs51 2018-08-05 Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2018-08-04 https://t.co/v53M8ILrit 2018-08-05 Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2018-08-04 https://t.co/GrCod4qf4E 2018-08-05… [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Last week in the Courts Judgment was given in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v Keable EA-2019-000733-DA (previously UKEAT/0333/19/DA). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm
See id.; Jansen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm
TYU v ILA Spa Limited EA-2019-000983-VP TYU was named in an employment tribunal judgment following proceedings brought by two former colleagues against ILA. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:40 pm
” That case was Zacchini v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Member states review key copyright issues (WIPO) (IPKat) (Daily Dose of IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Class 46) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Law360) Patent policy to be investigated by Federal Trade… [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Assisted in coordinating the Produce Safety Rule oriented On-Farm Readiness Review (OFRR) training programs under the leadership of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), the FDA, and produce oriented professionals from several State Cooperative Extension Services2. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Tаx attorneys, EAs, CPAs tax еxреrtѕ аrе thе bеѕt professionals to make tаx negotiations for уоu to bеnеfіt frоm any оf аvаіlаblе tаx rеlіеf орtіоnѕ еffесtіvеlу. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
(Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
” (The 2013 Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Federal Transit Administration’s NEPA analysis resulti [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
