Search for: "EA v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 5:55 am
Samuel Michael Keller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:36 am
"Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
Supreme Court in the now-infamous eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:12 am
The case is James "Jim" Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
But the district court also found that the environmental assessment (EA) prepared by the Forest Service for the plan to construct the snowmobile trail connecting the Fowl Lakes adjacent to the BWCAW failed to properly analyze the noise impact resulting from snowmobile use on the trail, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Indeed, the current authority of EA’s board, which the District Court and EA take for granted, is a product of state law arrangements, and the proposal merely seeks to amend the state law arrangements currently governing the company’s exercise of discretion. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
"The Tribunal also found that it was not prepared to allow the late claiming of other exemptions in this case, except where s.40(2) had been claimed.Home Office and Ministry of Justice v IC EA/2008/0062 [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
The case involves a precatory shareholder proposal asking the board of directors of EA to propose an amendment to EA's charter or bylaws requiring EA to include in its proxy materials shareholder proposals that would otherwise be excludable under Rule 14a-8. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Member states review key copyright issues (WIPO) (IPKat) (Daily Dose of IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Class 46) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Law360) Patent policy to be investigated by Federal Trade… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
Winter v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
If you're interested in tracking the case yourself, it is Geral Willis v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 10:51 pm
Bebchuk v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:01 pm
SCOTUS, the states, and perhaps Verbal Kint.) [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
In that case, the ICA held that the state must complete an environmental assessment (EA) prior to approving a permit allowing the importation of genetically engineered algae. [read post]
