Search for: "EEOC v. May and Co., Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
The Supreme Court may have other opportunities to revisit Masterpiece as well, with a petition for certiorari expected this summer in Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:26 am by Lorene Park
If willful intent is shown (“reckless disregard” under Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Though the future employer might be liable under a “joint employer” theory, further factual development was needed to make that determination (EEOC v Grane Healthcare Co). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:27 am by Elizabeth Wydra
  Never in that two hundred years had the Court held that secular, for-profit corporations like Hobby Lobby or its co-litigant Conestoga Wood may assert rights under the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
He noted that the Fourth Amendment requires, but the OFCCP has not adopted, the Fourth Amendment procedural protections of: subpoenas for contractor objections to off-site investigations, as required by the High Court’s 1946 decision in Oklahoma Press Pub Co v Walling (10 LC ¶51,222), and warrants for contractor objections to on-site investigations, as required by Supreme Court’s 1978 ruling in Marshall v Barlow’s Inc (436 U.S. 307). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Attempts to unseal can work even years after the sealing, see, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
” Defendant Failure to Produce in Agreed Upon Format Leads to Dispute with Plaintiffs: In EEOC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
Likewise, five African-American employees were allowed to proceed on their retaliation and hostile environment claims based, in part, on an allegation that, after a coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and a “class of Black employees,” they were given excessive workloads as compared to non-African-American workers (Rogers v Ford Motor Co). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
Nordic Village, Inc., 503 U.S. 30, 37 (1992) (applying sovereign immunity principles to bankruptcy proceedings); Ardestani v. [read post]