Search for: "ESCAPES!, INC." Results 281 - 300 of 1,915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
WPIX, Inc., a 2020 New York case; the facts in the text are based on Rainbow, but modified for the sake of the hypothetical.) [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 1:21 am by Jon L. Gelman
-100% protection against severe disease-Final analysis in U.K. trial confirms 96% efficacy against original strain of COVID-19-Efficacy against variants confirmed in U.K. and South AfricaNovavax, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:21 pm by Patent Docs
(see "The Zombie Apocalypse of Patent Eligibility Reform and a Possible Escape Route").... [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This decision acknowledged that some deception is necessary to escape preemption, but said that a plaintiff is not required to plead reliance and damages. [read post]
Malwarebytes, Inc., a 2019 case where the Ninth Circuit looked at the overlap of Section 230 and antitrust law. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:45 am by Russell Knight
This duty is based on the court’s concern that, were it unable to sanction a party for the presuit destruction of evidence, a potential litigant could circumvent discovery rules or escape liability simply by destroying the proof prior to the filing of a complaint. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 9:23 am by Venkat Balasubramani
” As Venkat points out, the breach of contract claim was always mockable because AWS’s contract has multiple escape hatches. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Giustra wrote jointly to Twitter’s Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
The case was filed by Children’s Rights, Inc., a national child advocacy organization based in New York. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
At twenty-one years old, Aaron Westrick shook hands with death. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]