Search for: "Early v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 18,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
In California fear had an early lead as San Quentin prison opened in 1851, just two years after statehood, and well ahead of the University of California which was chartered in 1868. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2004, 10:24 am
Friday's Boston Globe reports that notices has been sent to town and city clerks in Massachusetts advising them of training sessions for the issuance of same-sex marriage licences in early May, prior to the date of May 17 when the first state-authorized same-sex marriages licenses in the US are set to be issued pursuant to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am by Tyler Green
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
By accepting and integrating the decisions of the ad hoc miners' courts and other early bodies, the developing territorial courts provided continuity of law. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 4:05 pm
She said: "I hope to be President of all 50 states and U.S. territories, and that we have all 50 states represented and counted at the Democratic convention. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:46 am
The conversation became serious because Haley stated he was tired of hiding in Singer's closet, literally, whenever his son and neighbors came by, and an argument ensued. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
This ILB entry yesterday gave some early reaction to oral arguments heard yesterday by the SCOTUS in the Indiana case of Ahmad Edwards v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm by John Elwood
It’s still too early to have much of an idea what the Supreme Court might be doing in Harrington v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Gore that the state could not arbitrarily value one person’s vote over that of another might be used to force states to improve their election processes through litigation. [read post]