Search for: "Economou v. Little"
Results 281 - 300
of 4,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
For example, the dancers had little opportunity to profit off their own managerial abilities. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:52 am
Citizens United was fun; the Skilling argument provided a nice little walk down memory lane; but McDonald v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:37 am
I have been keeping my eye out for an article on the CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am
Therefore, as also indirectly confirmed by the District Court of the Hague’s decision in Sisvel v Xiaomi, the need for a higher degree of scrutiny on essentiality claims is crucially important. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
The article is an offshoot of a speech Steve recently gave for JP Morgan (Hong Kong) and it is entitled "Danone v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
In the little-noticed case of Sagana v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Carijano v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:37 pm
They have interfered with these witnesses' professions, professional relationships, and economic opportunities. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:22 am
The plaintiff in Szeinbach v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:09 am
ABS has a limited potential for increasing access to justice for those with low incomes because as profit-seekers in the market for legal services, ABS entities don’t have an economic incentive to do so – there’s little ROI for creating innovations or new legal services for that sector. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm
On Tuesday, in Nuziard v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
It's probably safe to surmise that the plaintiff's position probably received little sympathy outside of certain members of the Bar:Mark V. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
” And in Veix v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:13 pm
Klapper v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
There’s nothing particularly new or ground-breaking about the recent Ontario Superior Court Decision in Sierra Excavating v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:57 am
–Sedlik v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
Well done, LexisNexis Butterworths, for unearthing Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 1251 (Ch), an obscure ruling by Mr Justice David Richards in the Chancery Division yesterday on a neat little passing-off point.Knight, a British citizen who lived in Australia, published three books in the UK between 1991 and 1996; each had the word 'Mythbusters' in its title. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:33 pm
Further, precedent, and Burwell v. [read post]
