Search for: "Elias v. Elia"
Results 281 - 300
of 398
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
Elias G. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:26 am
In [2011] EWCA Civ 890 the Chancellor of the High Court, together with Lords Justices Jackson and Elias, took just 51 paragraphs to affirm the position taken by Proudman J. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:42 am
Elia L. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The Court of Appeal (Aikens, Mummery and Elias LJJ) upheld this argument in February 2010. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
The Privy Council will also hand down the following judgments on Monday 18 July 2011: Permanent Secretary (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and Patrick Manning v Feroza Ramjohn, heard 10 – 11 May 2011; The Honourable Prime Minister Mr Patrick Manning, The Public Service v Ganga Persad Kissoon, heard 12 May 2011; and Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:48 am
Not only did the Supreme Court uphold that ban in McConnell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
DiMaggio, III v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Emile Elias & Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 15 June 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
"Lord Justice Rimer and Lord Justice Elias gave consenting judgments. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Secondly, the case of Emile Elias & Company Ltd v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago will be heard on Wednesday 15 June 2011 by Lords Phillips, Walker and Wilson. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
Rules create the so-called “bright lines” between entitlement and disentitlement; rules are also, by their nature, insensitive to particular household circumstances.In two recent decisions of the the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeal Chamber, the rules have been challenged as being insufficiently sensitive to individual household needs: RG v SSWP and North Wiltshire DC (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) and IB v Birmingham CC [2011] UKUT 23 (AAC). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:54 am
The recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Araci v Fallon contains a clear exposition of this point. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm
ALLEGATIONS: Plaintiff, was employed by Defendants as a tankerman aboard the M/V Mary Burke Liles. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:57 am
., PLLC v D'Elia ; 2011 NY Slip Op 21160 ; Decided on April 26, 2011 ; Appellate Term, Second Department attorney (plaintiff) has sued client (defendant) for fees, while at the same time attorney (defendant) is being sued for legal malpractice in Supreme Court by Client (plaintiff.) [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:47 pm
” (4) Page 69 – V. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 9:51 pm
Elias, 2011 Tex. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Paul Elias of the Associated Press explains what needs to be done -- namely, figure out how to rebut Kathy Hoskins's damaging testimony. [read post]
