Search for: "Ely v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 1,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am by Brian Cordery
The Court therefore gave consideration to what Lord Kitchin denoted the “Actavis questions” further to the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am by Eszter Szakács
Then, just like the HIPO, the court looked at the CJEU’s Eli Lilly judgment decision and stated that from that it is clear that in order to be eligible for an SPC for the combination there is no requirement for rosuvastatin to be mentioned structurally in the claim provided that the claim – interpreted in light of the description as provided in Art 69 EPC and the corresponding Hungarian rule – relates implicitly but necessarily and specifically to it. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 8:09 pm by Patent Docs
True Health Diagnostics LLC -- Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
  The state has a list of all registered voters. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
A Thought Experiment About the Academic ‘Billable’ Hour or Law Professors’ Work Habits Eli Wald is the Charles W. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:05 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Prior to this change, advice provided by foreign practitioners was not protected by patent attorney privilege (Eli Lilly & Company v Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals (No 2) [2004] FCA 850: ‘The language of s 200(2) is clear. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am by Thorsten Bausch
The ruling of the CJEU brings to mind the test proposed by Warren J. in Eli Lilly v Human Genom Sciences [2014] EWHC 2404 (Pat) (18 July 2014)). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
After all, Elie wants to know: What, if anything, did Kavanaugh know about Kozinski’s behavior? [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Bench Memos / National Review] * Speaking of which, Professor Steve Vladeck raises some good possible questions for the nominee about the interaction between Morrison v. [read post]