Search for: "Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 281 - 300
of 18,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2013, 4:55 am
Employer-only liability would be insufficient to deter wrongful discharges, as this case clearly demonstrates. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm
This endorsement provided that while a worker like the plaintiff was in temporary employment by an alternate employer named in the schedule, both workers’ compensation insurance and employers’ liability insurance would apply as if the alternate employer were insured. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 7:54 am
However, over the course of several years, French case law has rendered more stringent the criteria entitling the employee to claim co-employment by the group parent, making the chances of success of an action based on such ground more difficult. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:23 am
Similar results have been reached in volunteer fire fighter liability cases, where both the volunteer fire company and the sponsoring township enjoy immunity. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:16 pm
Although the employee alleged additional hostile work environment incidents, those incidents were isolated, and none were sufficiently severe as to warrant liability against Merrill Lynch, the court ruled in granting summary judgment to the employer. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm
The High Court quashed the decision of the Court of Appeal, concluding that the employer could not be attributed with Mr Hewett’s liability for negligence. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Although the potential for employer liability varies from state to state, all employers should be aware of the following case. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:49 am
This case illustrates the extensive confusion that can arise when determining liability in North Carolina car accident cases. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 9:49 pm
Similarly, the appellate court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that non-employee mission liability, which imposes vicarious liability outside of the employment context, applied. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:00 am
In practice however, case law is generally not inclined to exonerate the employer from its liability (even if the employee has committed a penal offence). [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 4:56 am
Jespersen’s case in an example of just how much liability employers can face when they fail to appropriately respond to employee complaints – especially those protected by whistleblower laws. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:46 am
In many cases, where employers seeking to sell their businesses through an asset sale or simply close down, withdrawal liability becomes an insurmountable obstacle. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Cason later asserted a claim under the Alabama Employer’s Liability Act, and Mrs. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:46 pm
However, proving liability for burn injuries in these complex cases requires the expertise of a skilled personal injury lawyer. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 11:27 am
The court explained that in some cases, an act of negligence on a commute may result in employer liability, but the facts present in this case did not warrant vicarious liability. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 11:27 am
The court explained that in some cases, an act of negligence on a commute may result in employer liability, but the facts present in this case did not warrant vicarious liability. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:46 am
Importantly, the vicarious liability doctrine is extended beyond the employer-employee relationship in copyright law so as to impose liability on anyone who “has the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity and also has a direct financial interest in such activities. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:47 am
A lot of employers, aware of potential legal liability, have sought to eliminate blatant displays of discrimination. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Generally, the Employer/Insurer will pay the injured employee a lump sum of money to relieve them of any past or future liability. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
When a plaintiff takes a voluntary nonsuit in a case asserting vicarious liability against an employer for its employee’s negligence, that plaintiff can re-file pursuant to the savings statute, even if the employee was voluntarily dismissed from the first case. [read post]
