Search for: "English v. English"
Results 281 - 300
of 9,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2024, 10:00 pm
The UK Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
In Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegialii [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), the High Court recently upheld the well-established principle that under English law, appeals against arbitral awards cannot be made on issues of fact. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Neither the parties nor the dispute had any connection with England or English law. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
Garner, Modern English Usage 666 (4th ed. 2016); Oxford English Dictionary 669 (2d ed. 1989). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:00 am
I noticed this procedure used in Ervin Mark Ball v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 1:01 am
The English, led by King Henry V, had between 6,000 and 9,000 men. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
In Southern Seeding Service, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:49 am
Regina (Boggis and Another) v Natural England Court of Appeal "The notification of a site of special scientific interest by English Nature was not a plan or project requiring an assessment of its conservation implications on any special protection area which it might affect. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:08 am
Byers and Others v Yacht Bull Corporation and Another Chancery Division “The court had no jurisdiction to hear a claim by English liquidators to beneficial ownership of a yacht acquired by money from Madoff Securities International Ltd. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:00 am
As explained in the point V. above, when contracting for services the practice of the Crown is to leave the burden of compensating the patentee to its agents. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
This was the question asked in English v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:40 am
Cardozo School of Law) have posted English Translation of Sabam V. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
Many years ago, in a junior high school English exam, this Kat wrote a phrase she had encountered several times in English magazines and American movies, etc.: ‘Long time no see’. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 3:02 am
McDonnell v. [read post]
