Search for: "English v. Jones"
Results 281 - 300
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
: EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES / EDITED BY AUSTIN SARAT, JURGEN MARTSCHUKAT New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011 HV8699.E85 I82 2011 See Catalog Capital punishment -- United States -- Cases MEXICANS ON DEATH ROW / RICARDO AMPUDIA; ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY SUSAN RASCON Houston, Tex.: Arte Publico Press, c2010 HV8699.U5 A7713 2010 See Catalog Capitalism -- United States WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS: HOW WASHINGTON MADE THE RICH RICHER, AND TURNED ITS BACK ON THE MIDDLE CLASS /… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Immunity of Expert Witnesses For civil practitioners, one of the most interesting and potentially far reaching decisions of the term was Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:53 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in CSX v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Kernott v Jones, heard 4 May 2011. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm
We posted a case comment on this and Rosalind English’s survey of the other coverage. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:10 am
Jones v Kernott, heard in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, garnered much media attention as the case may have a dramatic effect on the property rights of unmarried couples in England and Wales who separate. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That seems to be what happened in Alkhafaji v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
March 2011 Law Library Acquisitions ListAfricaKQC772 .K5 2010Statutory recognition of customary land rights in Africa : an investigation into best practices for lawmaking and implementation / by Rachael S. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
The AmeriKat has been watching the English public embrace the change of the season this week. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney (see earlier post by Rosalind English) removes the immunity previously enjoyed by those who have acted as experts from suit by their former clients. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
Second, this week the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Jones v Kaney that expert witnesses are no longer immune from civil suits. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
Moreover, under the doctrine established in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) a claimant may apply to have a claim struck out as an abuse of process on the basis that it does not involve the commission of a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
The Supreme Court has announced judgments of the following will be handed down on Wednesday 30 March next week: - Jones v Kaney, heard 11 – 12 January 2011 (here is our case preview); and - Duncombe and Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, heard 17-18 January 2011 (here is our case preview). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
So too, there is the very real potential for trivial claims to be struck under Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75, [2005] QB 946 for abuse of process. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
In Henderson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
It may have been that Ms Ehrenfeld had a potential defences to the claim – she could have set up a Reynolds defence of responsible journalism, or that she could have argued that it should be struck out as an abuse of process on Jameel grounds (Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The issues are (1) the application of copyright protection under English law to three dimensional works; and (2) whether a claim of an infringement under US copyright law is justiciable in England. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
Snyder v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
It is obviously not a specifically English or UK issue. [read post]
