Search for: "Express Recovery Services"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
The Judge did express “some sympathy” for the respondents, but allowed the appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 7:33 am
Per the Fifth Circuit, the notice requirement enables employers to protects its right of set-off against its future obligations and prevents double recovery on the part of the claimant. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals in New York City has once again held that a class action waiver provision contained in commercial contracts between merchants and charge card issuer/servicer American Express Co. was unenforceable.In light of its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
A subscription to LAW.COM is needed for online access to this service. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:42 am
The court also noted that a quantum meruit claim is not available when there is an express contract, as was also alleged in the petition. -- > Express contract renders recovery in quantum meruit unavailable.But the breach of contract claim was defective too, because the plaintiff tried to impose liability on two defendants, but the body of the petition referred only to one, and did not say which one opened the account or signed the contract. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 6:11 pm
” Continental argued that the unjust enrichment claim should be dismissed because the parties had entered into express contracts. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Int'l, 40 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 1994), approved both copyright and trademark infringement damages against the argument that this was an inappropriate double recovery. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
All defendants contended that they were subject to statutory immunity pursuant to Social Services Law § 419. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
In June 2009, Triple Canopy entered into an agreement to provide security services at the second-largest airbase in Iraq, Al Asad Airbase. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:25 pm
For American Express, that is Utah, for Discover Bank, it is Delaware. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:51 am
On a similar note, below is a dramatized version of a common fear expressed by my bankruptcy clients: Oh jeez, gosh darn. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 5:21 am
The First Circuit began its analysis by observing that it considered the appeal “against the backdrop of a strong pro-arbitration policy expressed by Congress and repeatedly upheld by the courts. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:12 am
The law also allows third-parties to bring so-called qui tam actions in the form liability claims under the Act; if the qui tam actions are successful, the third-party can receive a portion of the recovery. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
The Court held that holding such individuals liable would be inconsistent with the express exemption from FEHA of employers of fewer than five employees. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:40 am
Unlike the DMCA, though, the TPP doesn’t provide expressly for recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in such cases. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:24 pm
The express provision governed and the more general words could not be relied upon since it would allow double recovery. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
§ 29-28-106 provides as follows: No product liability action, as defined in § 29-28-102, shall be commenced or maintained against any seller, other than the manufacturer, unless: (1) The seller exercised substantial control over that aspect of the design, testing, manufacture, packaging or labeling of the product that caused the alleged harm for which recovery of damages is sought; (2) Altered or modified the product, and the alteration or modification was a substantial… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:37 am
Additionally, the health care system’s effectiveness is a significant factor in recovery. [read post]
