Search for: "FCA Holdings, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 9:17 am by Thomas Heintzman
Accordingly, the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision stands, confirming that Globalive is eligible to hold wireless licenses in Canada. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:17 am by Thomas Heintzman
Accordingly, the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision stands, confirming that Globalive is eligible to hold wireless licenses in Canada. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm by eithurburn@getnicklaw.com
A recently unsealed whistleblower complaint alleges that life insurance companies MetLife Inc. and Prudential Inc. violated the Minnesota False Claims Act by holding onto unclaimed benefits which the companies were required to turn over to the state’s unclaimed property unit. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
It was the thirteenth week of evidence at the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm by A. Brian Albritton
We hold, therefore, that the FCA's anti-retaliation provision is amenable to the use of the McDonnell Douglas framework. . . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:04 am by admin
 The district court dismissed Riddle’s suit, holding that the most analogous statute to the FCA is the Texas Whistleblower Act (TWA) which has a 90-day statute of limitations. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm by admin
Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc., the United States District court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that a whistleblower’s severance agreement releasing all claims against the employer does not bar qui tam claims where the government was unaware of the underlying fraudulent activity when the severance agreement was signed. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Lorraine Fleck
Havana Club Holding Inc., S.A., 2011 FCA 244 recently upheld a Trade-marks Opposition Board (TMOB) decision finding that THE SPIRIT OF CUBA was deceptively misdescriptive for Dominican rum. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
QS Holdings Sarl v Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) (ipwars)   Canada ACCC’s request for reconsideration of Board’s ruling re opt-outs denied (Excess Copyright) FCA upholds patent infringement and validity: Phostech v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:33 am by war
While the clients may have had a relevant fair dealing purpose, the news monitoring service’s purpose was not a fair dealing purpose but a commercial purpose of making copies for its clients: De Garis v Nevill Jeffris Pidler Pty Limited [1990] FCA 218. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
(Laws of 2011, Ch 436, §2, effective November 15, 2011) Second Department Holds That Counsel Fees May Be Requested under FCA 438 (a) At Any Time until the Appellate Process Has Concluded In Talty v Talty--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 3715407 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division, Second Department reversed an order of the Family Court which had vacated a counsel fee award of $11,893.04 and reinstated the award. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The doctors failed to identify any specific fraudulent claim submitted to the government, as is required to plead an FCA violation with the particularity mandated by the FRCP. [read post]