Search for: "FDIC "
Results 281 - 300
of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2021, 12:31 pm
On March 15, 2021, the FDIC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) released a Financial Institution Letter regarding diversity self-assessments. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 10:22 am
FDIC’s supervisory approach. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:18 am
The FDIC recently announced that it has entered into a Consent Order with Cross River Bank (CRB or Bank) to resolve FDIC charges that the Bank engaged in unsafe or unsound practices related to its fair lending compliance. [read post]
D&O Insurance: "Ambiguity" Whether Insured vs. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for FDIC's D&O Claims
7 Jan 2013, 11:58 pm
The FDIC was appointed as receiver for the failed bank. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
Additional Resources Full FDIC Report (PDF) [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm
The post FDIC Auctions First Republic Bank Amid Banking Crisis first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:00 am
When May the FDIC Remove to Federal Court? [read post]
22 Mar 2006, 1:13 pm
For the first time in 25 years, the FDIC (The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) has raised the maximum coverage amount on deposit insurance for bank and savings accounts. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:00 am
Although the OCC’s proposed revisions were issued jointly with the FDIC, the FDIC did not join in the final rule. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:25 am
The reforms included changes to the FDIC’s deposit insurance program, a series of measures to curb excessive risk-taking at large, complex banks and non-bank financial companies and a mechanism for orderly resolution of large, nonbank financial companies. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:59 am
The FDIC’s complaint alleges that Mutual Bank’s failure has cost the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund an estimated $775 million in losses. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:31 am
The settlements should serve as a reminder to non-banks entering into arrangements with FDIC-supervised banks that they can become subject to FDIC enforcement authority. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:29 am
Through the end of the first quarter, the FDIC had authorized lawsuit against 54 institutions, suggesting that the FDIC had authorized about 60% of the number of lawsuits that NERA projects the FDIC will file. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 1:35 pm
The FDIC has approved a final rule, effective October 1, 2024, to update its Section 19 regulations to conform to the Fair Hiring in Banking Act. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
The FDIC adopted the proposed $5 billion exclusion and no others. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
On June 5, 2024, Minnesota Bankers Association and Lake Central Bank (“Plaintiffs”), filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to appeal the Minnesota federal district court’s April 9, 2024 dismissal of the Plaintiffs’ lawsuit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) challenging the FDIC’s guidance on non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees.... [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:56 am
In a letter sent earlier this month, the Bank Policy Institute, the American Bankers Association and the Independent Community Bankers of America (the “trade groups”) have asked the FDIC for more time to comment on the agency’s proposal, published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2022, to update its existing regulations governing use and misuse of the FDIC’s name, logo and official sign, and adding further detail to rules regarding misrepresentation… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:27 am
A complaint filed on July 20, 2023 in Minnesota federal court seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) against defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Chairman Martin J. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Chopra discussed how Alameda Research was able to invest in an FDIC-supervised bank while avoiding FDIC review. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:54 am
FDIC, Judge White first addressed the AGs’ argument that the FDIC exceeded its authority in promulgating its “Madden-fix” rule because the rule permits the FDIC to impermissibly regulate the conduct of non-FDIC banks and has the effect of impermissibly preempting state laws. [read post]