Search for: "FLOYD v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:12 pm
("J & J Sports") of Campbell, California filed two federal lawsuits in the Northern District of Indiana, both alleging illegal interception of a cable signal for the Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
"The seminal case concerning the impact of the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement on an individual's statutory rights under Section 75 of the Civil Service Law is Antinore v State [40 NY2d 6].In Antinore the Court of Appeals held that in the event an individual elects to proceed with a disciplinary proceeding set out in a collective bargaining agreement, he or she may not later claim the right to relitigate the charges under a statutory due process… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Citing the dicta of Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 and adopting the structured approach in Pozzoli v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, Floyd held that it would not have been obvious to the skilled addressee to extend the seat into bed mode into the triangular space between the back of the seat and the cabin wall (the green section) which, in the BA First application, remained unused except for storage. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:12 am
On May 15, 2017, in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court created the doctrine of qualified immunity in a 1967 decision in the case Pierson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Floyd Merrell v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
The next day, Principal Wiygul and the school district’s attorney, Michele Floyd, askedBell about the song and its accusations. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
One such case is Generics [UK] Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Yeda Research And Development Co Ltd and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, decided yesterday by a three-man Court of Appeal for England and Wales which consisted of two specialist IP judges -- Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd -- together with Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:18 pm
In Holland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
Johnson and U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:20 am
Nelson said it was “preposterous” for the state and several of its witnesses to have asked jurors to ignore a host of possible contributing factors, including Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
James Earnest Floyd Jr.James Earnest Floyd is accused of killing a 69-year-old man in west Fort Worth and wounding his wife in a home invasion. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
Floyd J referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on whether streaming constituted a "communication to the public". [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
From Lull v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
Scott, 116 F.3d 137, 140 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1997); Floyd v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:16 pm
First, the Advocate-General's Opinion in the Amazon.com reference from the Austrian courts (see Eleonora's excellent summary here) and second, the CJEU's decision in the ITV v TV Catchup reference from Mr Justice Floyd in the English courts.Background For those not up to speed, broadcasters including ITV alleged that TV Catchup had infringed the copyright in its broadcasts by communicating those broadcasts to the public through a process of electronic transmission. [read post]
