Search for: "FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA" Results 281 - 300 of 576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2006, 2:34 am
  California v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 (Photo by Ben Challis)On March 8th, a French art history student was escorted out of the Louvre Museum in Paris. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
   He appeared to suggest Deschamps left out two players from the French squad because of their African origin. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
For those who prefer briefs to boxers, a periodic collection of fashionable events in the judicial system:Bar(red): Gap appeals South African trademark decisionSuffer the children: Gap under fire for abusive child labor in IndiaShe sees France: Paris Hilton sued for stealing panty-flasher's styleBay watch: Ninth Circuit sends PerfumeBay to watery grave in dilution caseContradiction in terms: Dueling Unique clothing firms in expensive trademark disputeBlind Alley: North Face wins damages in… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: Spirituality and Performance in Law School – A Reply to Professor Taylor, (California Western Law Review, Vol. 47, 2011).Micah Schwartzman, Conscience, Speech, and Money, (Virginia Law Review, April 2011).Jeffrey R. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm by Florian Mueller
It was originally supposed to be about various motions, and Judge Curiel made it clear that all those Rule 44.1 motions relating to questions under French law (governing the ETSI FRAND declaration) were basically summary judgment motions in disguise and he'd need more time to rule on them. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Justice Lucy McCallum has awarded French $300,000 damages for an internet campaign run by self-styled consumer advocate Michael Fraser, who sought to stalk  French and destroy his reputation. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am by Jim Jenkins
Polanski the photos were being shot for the French version of Vogue. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper)   US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
TERIX COMPUTER ND Cali 2014http://t.co/r8N6zDq81Q -> BitTorrent user found liable for direct and contributory infringement PURZEL VIDEO v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
TERIX COMPUTER ND Cali 2014http://t.co/r8N6zDq81Q -> BitTorrent user found liable for direct and contributory infringement PURZEL VIDEO v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:55 am by Adrian Lurssen
Perry v Schwarzenegger California Prop. 8 decision 8-4-2010[By: Bryan Beel |In: Personal Rights]3. [read post]