Search for: "FRITZ v. STATE" Results 281 - 292 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If there's anything worse than failing to specify standards for the alternative valuation, it's providing no alternative, as when the buy-sell mandates use of the stale fixed price, which brings us to this week's featured case, DeMatteo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm by Fred Abrams
Dowd represents the heirs of Austrian-Jewish cabaret artist Fritz Grunbaum in Bakalar v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  According to Piekos, Maher and Fitzgerald stated that the business was "going in a new direction"; that they didn't "really need" Piekos; and they proposed to pay themselves $8,500 per month which, based on then-current projections, would result in Piekos receiving $20,000 annual compensation compared to $120,000 each for Maher and Fitzgerald. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm by familoo
I wrote little in March and April because I went to the states on holiday for 3 weeks to see family. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]