Search for: "Federal v. Levine" Results 281 - 300 of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
[T]he EEOC Intake Questionnaire, revised in the wake of Federal Express Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
  Levine was about implied preemption, under which state-law gives way to federal law where it is impossible to comply with both. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:14 pm by Walter Olson
Levine (20) Widespread shortages of hospital drugs (8) Hospital drug shortages, cont’d (11) FDA overwarning (0) [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:46 am by Deborah Hammonds
  There are several provocative employment law issues awaiting the High Court during the 2013-2014 term, including the first case scheduled for oral arguments, Madigan v Levin (Dkt No 12-872), in which the Court will determine whether state and local government employees may avoid the ADEA and bring age discrimination claims directly under the Equal Protection Clause and Section 1983. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
In my latest FindLaw column, I use last week's Supreme Court decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm by Michael Cannon
In May 2013, several employers and individual taxpayers from federal-exchange states filed Halbig v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm by Bexis
  We’ve received the same bone-headed response from an appellate court in a branded case, seeWimbush v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:22 am
In an op-ed in the Kansas City Star Bert Rein, partner at Wiley Rein and of counsel to Wyeth in the Levine case, wrote, "Congress created federal public health agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration because it takes experts to consider the complexities and the risks and benefits of prescription drugs and medical devices. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:52 am by admin
Supreme Court ruled June 1 that, under the comity doctrine, a federal lawsuit brought by retail natural gas suppliers that challenges Ohio’s natural gas taxation scheme as unconstitutional must be dismissed because the action should have first been brought in state court (Levin v. [read post]