Search for: "Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co." Results 281 - 300 of 649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
(Jaclene D’Agostino, Ademption and the Power of Attorney, NYSBA Trusts & Estates Section Newsletter, at p.7, Vol. 42 [Fall 2009]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
(Jaclene D’Agostino, Ademption and the Power of Attorney, NYSBA Trusts & Estates Section Newsletter, at p.7, Vol. 42 [Fall 2009]). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:33 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The court noted that this issue had been addressed by the Ontario county court some 45 years ago in Dominion Bridge Co v Marla Construction Co, [1970] 3 OR 125. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:23 am by Peter Mahler
Accordingly, dismissal of both the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims was warranted (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney Inc., 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:22 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
It is possible, of course, for a trust to have two or more co-trustees and an estate to have two or more co-personal representatives. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
It also includes persons having priority for appointment as personal representative, and other fiduciaries representing interested persons. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 ACA litigation, including King v Burwell Self-reporting ACA violations Other topics, including cafeteria plan elections, etc. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:36 am by Ronald Mann
But they well might be: the big stretch necessary to reach the merits in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The question of whether Canadian lawyers ought to be trusted to govern themselves has been repeatedly raised by the public, policy-makers and the academy over the past several decades. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:23 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
This was the situation until the decision in Metropolitan Bank v Heiron, which was then followed by Lister & Co v Stubbs. [read post]