Search for: "First Union v. Steele" Results 281 - 300 of 319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Mich. 1987) ............................................................ 46 Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney fee… [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
Here's part I of the Obama Notre Dame Speech YouTube Video (sorry about the intro footage). [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in another decision issued today, New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Pyett, No. 07-581Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clause(From SCOTUSwiki): Justice Thomas's majority opinion held that nothing in either the National Labor Relations Act, which controls collective bargaining agreements made on behalf of union members, or the ADEA forbids unions from mandating arbitration to resolve statutory discrimination claims. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)   Global -… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Conference of January 9, 2008 __________________ Docket: 07-663 Case name: AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
  Both the lower court and the First Department disagreed, holding:  Arch did not waive the $1 million deductible in its policy, because the deductible endorsement does not bar coverage or implicate policy exclusions and therefore is not subject to the time requirements for disclaiming coverage under Insurance Law § 3420(d) (see Power Auth. of State of N.Y. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/18/2008 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/04/2008 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
To achieve any goal, one has first to know exactly where one stands. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:40 am
  In Carpenters & Millrights Local 2471 v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Local Union No. 7, No. 07-1832 In case alleging that iron workers' union conspired with local trade association to shut non-union contractors out of the structural steel industry in the greater Boston area in violation of state law, dismissal of state law claims as pre-empted by federal labor law is affirmed where plaintiffs' state law claims are pre-empted as per San Diego Bldg. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
NLRB Law Memo 07/17/2008 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]