Search for: "Fish v. Government Employees" Results 281 - 300 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2010, 10:00 pm
  Recently, in the Washington state court case of Endicott v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Clear Lam Packaging failed to have a hazardous waste storage permit, maintain aisle space in the hazardous waste storage area, keep hazardous waste containers closed, provide annual employee training and keep records about it, and have a complete contingency plan. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Clear Lam Packaging failed to have a hazardous waste storage permit, maintain aisle space in the hazardous waste storage area, keep hazardous waste containers closed, provide annual employee training and keep records about it, and have a complete contingency plan. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:13 am
In 2007, Sotomayor sided with the fishes and against power companies and the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
County of MonmouthGOVERNMENT - Open Public Records Act"The Open Public Records Act does not permit a government agency to withhold disclosure of the confidential agreement it reached with an employee to settle her sexual harassment lawsuit. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
Fish & Richardson Sued Over 'Hot Potato' Move The Recorder A San Francisco Bluetooth headset maker says Fish & Richardson played an unseemly game of hot potato by dropping it as a client and then turning around and suing for patent infringement the very next day. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  The Board rejected the Respondent's contention that the question of whether the parties' relationship was governed by 8(f) or 9(a) was not actually litigated in that case. [read post]