Search for: "Four Packages v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm
In California Renters, the City of San Mateo (City) denied an application to construct a four-story, ten-unit multifamily residential building. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
That the defendant had previously been convicted of habitual larceny was not sufficient to overcome this defect, as an indictment for habitual larceny must state the four predicate offense relied upon to establish the habitual status. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
” Slip Op. at 5, quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 11:27 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 09-3667, July 16, 2009. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
An Omaha-based beef packaging company entered into a settlement agreement with DOJ a year and a half ago to resolve the Office of Special Counsel’s investigation into whether the company was discriminating against noncitizens who were legally authorized to work in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
Yet Europe and the United States are at loggerheads over how regulation fits in the Rethink. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Although the analysis focuses on the history of patent law in the United States, it develops themes that illuminate the evolution of patent regimes in Europe [In this regard, the US is the sun to Europe's moon. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW) United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW) United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 11:00 am
The “Foundation” section also surveys how international human rights law treats the dissemination of hate speech, while also making legal comparisons between the domestic law approaches taken by the speech-protective United States, on one extreme, and victim-protective States such as Denmark and the Netherlands, on the other. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Indeed, sometimes it seems that they view constitutionalism not just as a normative benchmark, but as the exclusivenormative standard in relation to a state’s institutional setup: for the authors, asking whether something “must be permitted” is the same question as asking whether “constitutionalism requires that they be permitted” (10). [read post]
