Search for: "Fraser v. Fraser" Results 281 - 300 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 8:09 am by Siobhan Hayes and Indeg Kerr
After the Good Harvest case of 2010 and the K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser case in 2012 we have faced considerable difficulties giving clients certain advice about aspects of the law in this area but now it is entirely clear that assignments to current guarantors are void and we have to deal with the consequences. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:22 am by Legal Beagle
Mr Hamilton went onto discuss the case of Gail Sheridan being interviewed by Lothian & Borders Police in connection with charges against the Sheridans for perjury in the Sheridan v News International case. [read post]
This post first appeared on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog On 25 May, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24, which held that Fraser, who had been convicted of murdering his wife, had received an unfair trial contrary to Article 6 ECHR, because of the Crown’s failure to disclose evidence to the defence.  [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgmentNever too late 93 [week ending on Sunday 24 April] - No UK judges in the UPC? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  First, there is the Sheriff’s Court case of Sinclair or Fraser v Fraser (16 July 2010) in which Sheriff Margaret Neilson awarded damages of £5,000 in respect of oral defamatory statements by the defender about the pursuer, who had been a co-worker with Leonard Cheshire Disability. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Workers’ Comp: Independent ContractorsWest Fraser Mills Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
However, in the case of TSCC 1704 v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:52 am by Steve Matthews
David Silman, an injury lawyer with the Fraser Valley’s Waterstone Law Group, took issue with the recently upheld decision of Hussack v. [read post]