Search for: "Fund of Funds, Limited v. First American Fund of Funds" Results 281 - 300 of 2,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am by Kali Borkoski
The first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
Like other such programs (such as broadly available funding programs, tax exemptions, or access to government property), it should be seen as a form of “limited public forum,” in which the government may impose content-based limits but not viewpoint-based ones. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
  <> USDA Announces First Citrus Greening Funding Allocations and Appointments to Citrus Disease Subcommittee - May 13, 2014 – United States Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced more than $1.5 million in funding to expand bio-control efforts to fight Huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening. . . [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:55 am by Lyle Denniston
First Derivative Traders (09-525) — Securities fraud liability of investment adviser to a mutual fund for the fund’s misleading statements about trading practices. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
The case could provide the first opportunity for the Court under Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jackson Women’s Health Organization.That right was first recognized 49 years earlier, in 1973, in the landmark decision in Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
  Pix Credit HERENorges Bank announced its decision to revoke the exclusion of Precious Shipping PCL from the Fund. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  Among those limitations was interracial marriage. 1883—Pace v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:50 pm
Fellow plaintiffs include the Wikimedia Foundation, Human Rights Watch, PEN American Center, the Global Fund for Women and other civil society, legal and media organizations. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
Vanderbilt University, [200 S.W.2d 510]; Hammond Post No. 3, American Legion v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 3:42 am by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
In that sense, the substantial dimension involves necessarily the protection of human rights because the latter represents a limit to the democratic governments (Gelman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Mark Rumold
First, the FISC (until very recently) did not have adversarial proceedings—it only heard from the government, and its proceedings remain both far more limited and more secretive than a regular court’s. [read post]