Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 281 - 300 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
The problem is that the Justice Department declined to bring such charges. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am by Jason P. Hipp
Many in the United States take these protections for granted and may not even think about them on a daily, or even weekly, basis. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm by Florian Mueller
The question of access to justice is key for all intents and purposes, including that the ultimate "appeal" in a figurative sense would be an annulment action before the European Court of Justice by one or more EU Member States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Mark MacCarthy
In the United States, by contrast, such vital questions could not be raised before U.S. courts because of the broad immunity from liability that Section 230 grants. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In a new article, “The Law of AI for Good,” I seek to apply insights from The Equality Machine by critically examining the current legislative and regulatory reforms being introduced in the United States and Europe and argue that these are limited in their reach and too narrow in their vision on what a tech regulatory scheme can and should look like. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Alternatively, the alien can be “paroled,” i.e., released into the United States on conditions pending resolution of his application. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
DEA’s Proposed Telemedicine Prescribing Rules: An Overview Pursuant to the authority granted in 21 U.S.C. [read post]
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
And now, the Department of Justice has embraced this argument. [read post]