Search for: "Giles v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Giles v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:41 am
Interestingly, Justice Stevens noted an admiration for the late Federal Circuit Judge Giles Rich, who wrote the original State Street Bank opinion. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:12 pm
The name of the game is no longer the claim Judge Giles Rich (about whom more later) famously stated that “the name of the game is the claim. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:26 am
As explained by the Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
" Giles v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Giles, 83 N.C. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Adelphia Defendants Denied New Trial; Claim That Chief Witness' Testimony Was Perjured Is Rejected
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:39 am
But by the same token, decisions of courts in other member states can also provide useful guidance". [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Giles v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:59 am
Giles of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Judge Jane R. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
” Giles S. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
Giles. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Giles. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
Judge Giles S. [read post]
