Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 281 - 300 of 67,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2017, 3:39 pm by Brian Leiter
The reasons given seem to me quite sound, and so I will also continue my practice of... [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:47 pm
SCOTUSBLOG is the NY Times, or maybe - given its focus on one particular field - the Wall Street Journal, of the legal blog world. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Philippa Strum, Professor Emerita of the City University of New York and a Senior Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center will be speaking on Speaking Freely: Whitney v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:07 am
Lords Valley Xtra Mart, 2009 WL 2430339 (Pike Co. 2009)Some of the recent trial court post-Koken opinions have also been given Westlaw citations as well:Decker v. [read post]
NOT IN MY CITY: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT GIVEN TEETH IN NIMBY DISPUTE: PASTER PREVAILS IN FIGHT TO HAVE HALFWAY HOUSE ZONED OUT OF THE WAY.Barr v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:44 am
R (Bassetlaw District Council) v Worksop Magistrates’ Court; [2008] WLR (D) 350 “On the determination under s 52 Licensing Act 2003 of an application for review of a premises licence in circumstances involving criminal conduct connected with the licensed premises, consideration must be given to what was necessary to promote the objective of crime prevention, and to the needs of the wider community, and not be limited to guidance and remedial action and to the… [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:52 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Testimony that: (A) was given as a witness at a trial, hearing, or lawful deposition, whether given during the current proceeding or a different one; and... [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 7:50 am by Howard Wasserman
Early in last week's argument in Packingham v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 4:30 am by Matthew Pitman
Reliance was asserted upon the contractual documentation in this case, in that the participants were given the right to control in accordance with their terms. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:26 am by sally
Regina (Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and others intervening) [2010] EWCACiv 1094; [2010] WLR (D) 251 “Legal advice privilege applied only to advice given by a member of the legal profession. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Jump Rope Systems is asking the full Federal Circuit to overturn its own decision in XY, LLC v. [read post]
Thus, the judgment was reversed to the extent that it decided to award profits and the case remanded fort a new trial on that issue (Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]