Search for: "Givens v. Greene" Results 281 - 300 of 2,391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 11:32 am by Mack Sperling
The Business Court has given the same interpretation to Rule 30(e) at least three times, in BB&T Boli Plan Tr. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the facts of this case were as follows: Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek is a member of the Austrian Green Party and was from 2008 to 2017 its federal spokesperson. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This is particularly important given the burden of proof that is imposed on the Crown. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:40 am
  In Carpenters & Millrights Local 2471 v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Given these two very different interpretations of RFRA, why should we read the statute as argued by the dissent? [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm by Eric Goldman
Given the adverse precedent that’s recently accumulated (plus the low-quality lawyering in Trump’s cases), there is no doubt that Trump’s claims will fail should they reach a Ninth Circuit ruling on the merits. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
But such hopes were speculative, given the client’s right to terminate counsel at any time, with or without cause. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:14 am
The case of Grainger PLC v Nicholson UKEAT/0219/09/ZT gained lots of media coverage, including the front page of today’s The Independent (“Green beliefs win legal protection”). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
The first, handed down on 21 May 2014, was R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor [2014] UKSC 31; the second was R (Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council & Anor [2015] UKSC 7, which was handed down on 25 February 2015. [read post]