Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 281 - 299 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
’: (LawFont.com)BrazilElectronic copies of oppositions now available on internet: (International Law Office)CanadaSam Trosow on latest CMEC copyright bulletins: (Michael Geist),ComputerWorld Canada on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Deemed abandonment provisions pose traps for the unwary: (International Law Office),Trade mark appeals: stays and service requirements: (Canadian Trademark Blog),Franchising into Canada: (IP finance),More Champagne, anyone? [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:42 am
(PDF 1.2 MB) Report Prepared Under the Auspices of the National Intelligence Council03/19/2008 Lawsuit Filed in the Matter of Fred Hollander v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the 2003 year of account and others… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
CIR    Commissioner of Internal Revenue 08a0101p.06 AmeriCredit Fin Serv v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 8:01 pm
" Wikipedia has a nice write up on the Commissioner v Banks and Baniatis, the case which Settlement Professionals, Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
V is for VANOC, the Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee, which persuaded the federal government to pass special legislation that grants it unique powers to guard against unauthorized use of the Olympic marks. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (06-1210). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:27 am
Commissioner, 403 F.2d 611, 621 (1968), and instead go 'outside the statutory framework,' Dewees v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:10 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286); and August 24 in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Littriello responded by initiating complaints for judicial review in districtcourt, contending that the regulations in question (1) exceed the authority of the Treasury to issue regulatory interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) conflict with the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in Morrissey v. [read post]