Search for: "Grant v. Parker" Results 281 - 300 of 731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am by Mack Sperling
Lawyers defending against punitive damages claims ought to put on their dancing shoes after the North Carolina Supreme Court's decision Friday in Scarborough v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am by MBettman
With viewpoints similar to their respective positions in Parker, the Chief and Justice Kennedy disagreed in their respective positions in State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
It is sufficient for the claimant to be affected by the court's determination: see Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union[2009] EWCA Civ 387, [2010] 1 WLR 318 at [120] (Aikens LJ), Feetum v Levy [2005] EWCA Civ 1601, [2006] Ch 585 at [82] (Jonathan Parker LJ) and Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 270, [2012] 1 P&CR 3 at [44] (Mummery LJ). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
Browne (1807) 8 East 162 and (1807) 14 Ves Jun 156; Parker v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
Browne (1807) 8 East 162 and (1807) 14 Ves Jun 156; Parker v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:02 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Parker, in a separate opinion, would affirm the lower court judgment in its entirety (Kwan v The Andalex Group, LLC, December 16, 2013, Koeltl, J). [read post]