Search for: "Grant v. Public Works, Dept"
Results 281 - 300
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
Court annuls penalty imposed after finding appointing authority failed to investigate before taking disciplinary action against individual Matter of Titone v Rocky Point Fire Dept., 2010 NY Slip Op 33037(U), October 25, 2010, Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Judge Jeffrey Arlen Spinner [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]Joseph A Titone filed a petition “in the nature of mandamus” pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR challenging his suspension… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Publications, Inc. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:09 am
Div., 3rd Dept., 262 AD2d 925Matyjczuk v Delphi Automotive Sys., App. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
" Senior's brief also cites case precedent, including Tonkery v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
Dept. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm
v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court stated that public policy prohibited enforcing an illegal contract. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
Dept. of Justice, Civ. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
… It seemed better on all sides to work together,” city General Counsel Cindy Laquidara told board members as she explained the settlement proposal. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:44 am
In unanimously AFFIRMING Supreme Court's order granting summary judgment to Nationwide, the Fourth Department agreed that the policy's criminal act exclusion applied to negate liability coverage in favor of Harmer: In Slayko v Security Mut. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 7:22 am
” In Ochocinska v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:41 am
Assn. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Public policy " is to be ascertained by reference to the laws and legal precedents and not from general considerations of supposed public interests'" (Kraut v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:00 pm
" DeName's brief principally relied on Matter of Hayes v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
Carter v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:22 am
”Thus, said the court, Supreme Court should have granted Leary’s petition and annulled the Board’s determination. [read post]
