Search for: "Grant v. Royal"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 11:58 pm
Although both parties behaved poorly towards each other, H perhaps worse than W, the very high threshold mandated by the authorities (Miller and McFarlane, S v S, McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] 1 FLR 1508) for conduct to be capable of being reckoned is not crossed. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 11:40 am
Spain, Isolux v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
In addition to Kiobel, the Court also granted cert. in Mahamad v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
To paraphrase Siebrasse, in English law "the grant of a patent was an exercise of the royal prerogative, and as such wholly within the discretion of the Crown. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
” The justices granted two other petitions for review on Monday: Bouarfa v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
The trial court granted summary judgment for Farmers. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
While we wait for the official Communication later this month, it seems that ISP safe harbours are here to stay and new strategies are being developed for user generated content... watch this space...** The end of the Google Books legal saga The US Supreme Court refuses to grant certiorari in the epic story that is The Authors' Guild v Google Books. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:03 am
Royal v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Now, one real-life royal has been thrown into the fray. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
Royal Petroleum Co. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
It sounds tranquil, but she was in the midst of reading a beast of a judgment from Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in the ongoing Virgin Atlantic saga in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] EWCA Civ 1713. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
On Thursday 18 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:28 am
In Saxon v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:28 am
In Saxon v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Mohammed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (1995) 27 HLR 439, it was held that, as a general rule, accommodation made available for an applicant pending enquiries as to what (if any) duty was owed to him under Pt 7, Housing Act 1996, was not within the scope of s 3, so that an authority do not have to obtain a possession order before evicting an applicant. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Patents In 'When is the “text-intended for grant” not intended for grant? [read post]
