Search for: "HAWKINS v. HAWKINS"
Results 281 - 300
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
On Tuesday, while the world was focused on the awful events in Brussels, SCOTUS delivered the first of what may turn out to be several deadlocked votes, delivering a 4-4 tie in the case of Hawkins v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
Wrong.The three dissenters on the en banc panel who contended that the strip search was totally okay (and hence didn't violate the child's rights) consisted of (1) a Reagan appointee (Chief Judge Kozinski), (2) a Bush II appointee (Judge Bea), and (3) a Clinton appointee (Judge Hawkins). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
” Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:09 am
And another appeal by California.But, this time, the panel consists of Judges Hawkins, Tashima, and Bea. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
In other words, took the middle road: affirmed the convictions while marginally allowing some benefit to a criminal defendant.Judge Hawkins, joined by Judges Pregerson, Reinhardt, and Wardlaw, writes the "liberal" opinion, which would find error and reverse the convictions. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:25 pm
Norington v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" (See prior related posting.)In Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 pm
In Hawkins v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 1:49 pm
Hawkins v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
The recent Tennessee Court of Appeals decision of Deborah Mason Hawkins v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:33 pm
’” Id. at 196, 777 S.E.2d at 830 (quoting Hawkins v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 2:34 am
US v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:02 am
It probably was not a good sign for Texas in Banister v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:47 pm
In the oral argument on CBOCS West v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:43 am
US v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:08 am
Comm. of Middletown, l85 N.J. 566, 582-85 (2006); Hawkins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 8:51 pm
Hawkins, 2007 U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:50 pm
Starr v. [read post]
