Search for: "HEATH v STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
When the matter reconvened in April 2006, Soule, who had relocated with the child out of state, appeared via telephone. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:59 am by Steve Hall
Concern that prisoners were being tortured to death was at the heart of the landmark 2008 Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:11 pm by NL
Secondly, the Judge was wrong to state that neither letter contained a decision amenable to challenge by way of review and appeal under the Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:49 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrate’s Court & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 332 (25 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v MK (Tunisia) [2011] EWCA Civ 333 (25 March 2011) Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331 (25 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bowker & Anor (t/a Lagopus Services) v The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [2011] EWHC 737 (QB) (25… [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:10 pm by cdw
STILL WORKING ON Heath Lavon McCray v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Supreme Court Chaytor & Ors, R v (Rev 2) [2010] UKSC 52 (01 December 2010) Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53 (01 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullings v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2820 (01 December 2010) Webster v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2819 (01 December 2010) SB, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2620 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) International Management Group (UK) Ltd v German & Anor [2010]… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am by Steve Hall
As noted above, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:40 am by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0523, 2010 MT 191, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]