Search for: "HEDGES v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment
At Will Employee's Contract Breach, Discharge Claims Dismissed; State Law Whistleblower Claim Survives
Geldzahler v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
In 1972, in Furman v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm
In Giger v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
In its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 10:52 am
In Bulldog Investors General Partnership v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
Congress has had numerous opportunities to state its will. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:57 am
By Daniel RichardsonHall v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:57 am
By Daniel RichardsonHall v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
In June, The Louisiana Court of Appeals published their opinion for Watts V. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
However, Senator Hagan noted that 619(f) does not limit in any manner transactions and normal banking relationships with a fund not controlled by the banking entity or a fund sponsored by the banking entity.Section 619(d)(4)(I) permits certain banking entities to operate hedge and private equity funds outside of the United States provided that no ownership interest in any hedge or private equity fund is offered for sale or sold to a U.S. resident. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:48 am
Enfish v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 7:48 am
This case is dismissed.The case is Ray v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:18 am
Emery Bay PKI, Kelly v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Perhaps because many hedge funds had been registered before and the SEC is more familiar with the risks with hedge funds. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Perhaps because many hedge funds had been registered before and the SEC is more familiar with the risks with hedge funds. [read post]
