Search for: "HOGAN v. HOGAN" Results 281 - 300 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2021, 12:31 am by Florian Mueller
The other is Hogan Lovells.For lack of local case law, the Hamburg Regional Court is a dark horse with respect to standard-essential patent (SEP) enforcement--and a case like this is an opportunity for that court to make a decision that might get a lot of attention and attract more filings of that kind.Both Hogan Lovells and Bardehle have offices in Dusseldorf, and Nokia brought some of its own cases against OPPO in that city. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:41 pm
The judge noted that he was getting started “less than a month” (26 days exactly) since the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:19 pm by Kim Zetter
Under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Claims against other defendants were dismissed.In Hogan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ontario’s Human Rights Commission had previously taken the position that gender identity was still a protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code based on the ban against sex discrimination, and the Human Rights Tribunal agreed with this interpretation in several cases, including in Hogan v. [read post]
This entry is an excerpt from Hogan Lovells’ “Future-proofing privacy: A guide to preparing for the EU Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 12:45 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Dennis Crouch discusses patent claims cancellation and inter partes review (IPR) in the U.S. and comments on the case of Baxter Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
FaceTime, iMessages hang in the balance after Apple loss to patent troll https://t.co/36u0zeKRwO -> Billionaire Peter Thiel funded Hulk Hogan lawsuit to take down Gawker https://t.co/COisqq2dFV -> Music Piracy Triggers Significant Losses, EU Study Shows https://t.co/xrc3leGqiF -> Copyhpe Friday’s Endnotes – 05/27/16 https://t.co/ZFTKV0YRH4 -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2016-05-28 https://t.co/IKkccDlHP7 -> Reimagining the Copyright Board – my… [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:33 am by Scott Bomboy
Fueling these theories were comments made in a 2017 Supreme Court decision, Packingham v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions Body: Below is today's property law Appellate Court opinion: AC30545 - Hogan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:11 am by Máiréad Enright
The recent judgment of Hogan J. in Izmailovic v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am by Darius Whelan
 Hogan J. does not refer explicitly to the significant Irish employment law case of Lewis v Squash Ireland [1983] ILRM 363. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:41 am
. * Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive mandates a substantive change, says Irish Court of AppealThe InfoSoc Directive was found to introduce changes allowing graduated response systems as a form of injunction - independently of a finding of their liability, said Hogan J in Sony Music Entertainment Ireland Ltd & Ors v UPC Communications Ireland Ltd. [read post]