Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER"
Results 281 - 300
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 6, 2010 SLT 261 and Cadder v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court The appeal has been heard by Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The case of E (Children) will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:27 am
Merriwether Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There is only one Supreme Court appeal in the second week of the Easter Term, commencing with a two-day hearing of Autoclenz Limited v Belcher and others to be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Clarke and Sir Nicholas Wilson on Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 May 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Logically, it is enough that Walker is gay and may someday hope to get married, because such a judge still will benefit from that ruling. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
However, a minority of three (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale) held that the breach of appellants’ fundamental rights should not be marked by an award only of nominal damages, although they reached no agreement on what the figure should be: see Walker at §195 suggesting an award of £1,000 each; Lord Hope at §180 suggesting something substantially less; and Lady Hale §217 suggesting £500. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
Arbitration practitioners will be hoping for clear guidance from the Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
Back in April of 2010, we learned how a Louisiana trial court gave hope to homeowners in Simon Figer & Rebecca Finger v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:25 pm
" Schill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
As Lord Hope put it: 199. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lord Walker points out that the 2002 Regulations were clearly aimed at catching foreign nationals seeking to take advantage of the UK benefit system (a point acknowledged by Lord Hope at para 49). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
