Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES" Results 281 - 300 of 3,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
Considering the employee’s personnel record in determining the severity of the disciplinary penalty to be imposedWinters v Lakeland CSD, 295 A.D.2d 355, Reversed, 99 N.Y.2d 549Lakeland Central School District Head Custodian Hugh Winters was found guilty of a number of charges alleging misconduct, incompetence, and insubordination including his "removing and photocopying a document from the school [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
Pepperdine Caruso Law’s Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Religious Liberty Clinic amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Charter Day School v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:48 am by Howard Bashman
And at the “Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog,” Steinman has a related post titled “Hughes v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 6:05 am by Joseph Robinson
On Friday, July 27th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in GoPro, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Steve Brachmann
On Wednesday, August 15th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in BSG Tech LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:15 am by Gene Quinn
The Federal Circuit recently reversed the District of Minnesota’s denial of summary judgment in Solutran, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:02 am
Employee's termination affirmed based on her failure to show that the reasons given by her employer for dismissal were pretextualHughes v City of Bethlehem, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #07-2349, Decided October 2, 2008After Catherine Hughes was terminated from her employment with the City of Bethlehem, she sued, alleging employment discrimination based on her gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; employment discrimination based on her having a… [read post]