Search for: "HUNTER v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 281 - 300
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
A: [Robert Hunter, Consumer Federation of America] This is the same threat we heard when California was considering its tough law, Proposition 103. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
The Ninth Circuit decision in Gordon v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:40 am
(Law professor Nan Hunter comments today on this reason for intervention.) [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
In Arias v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:19 pm
The issue decided by the California Supreme Court in Arias v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
In a post here last May, I talked about the California Supreme Court's decision in In Re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298, suggesting that in that decision, the Supremes might have enlarged the field of potential litigation under California's notorious UCL, and I also gave a little history of how the UCL grew out of control, became a playground for uninjured bounty-hunters and eventually ran into a voter buzz-saw in… [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
In this sense, Hunter-Seattle is consistent with that other Hunter doctrine -- Hunter v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Evans, to overturn Bowers v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 6:21 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Hunter, 588 P.2d 326, 340 (Ariz. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:14 pm
Many businesses call it a bounty-hunter statute. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
According to this report from the San Francisco Chronicle, the California Supreme Court has denied review of Defend Bayview Hunters Point Committee v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:03 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Cary v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
The case of Defend Bayview Hunters Point Committee v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 162 BC: Eleazar Maccabeus was crushed to death at the Battle of Beth-zechariah by a War elephant that he believed to be carrying Seleucid King Antiochus V; charging in to battle, Eleazar rushed underneath the elephant and thrust a spear into its belly, whereupon it fell dead on top of him * 4 BC: Herod the Great suffered from fever, intense rashes, colon pains, foot drop, inflammation of the abdomen, a putrefaction of his genitals that produced worms, convulsions, and difficulty… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
I also thought it would be useful to consider what measures could have been undertaken to prevent the misunderstandings that led to the 3M v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:19 pm
The California Court of Appeal agreed with my opinion of class-action lawsuits in the recent decision, Starbucks v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:22 am
” Starbucks v. [read post]
