Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The phrase marriage of convenience is “a term of art” in Lady Hale’s analysis. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:11 am
Here is the opinion in Medina v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 4:40 am
., in his capacity as trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Gary Eugene Hale v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale each gave separate dissenting judgments. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:48 am
Here is the cert petition in Sulgrove v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Just to give one example, the Federal Circuit cited Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
(quoting Largoza v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:45 am
For clarity, Birmingham v Ali is the Aweys v Birmingham appeal. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
The more recent development of that approach by Hale LJ in Eagle v Chambers [2003] EWCA Civ was also cited approvingly by the Court. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
Lady Hale would have allowed the appeal under the Wednesbury challenge. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
The proposed bench for the hand-down will consist of the following Supreme Court Justices: Lady Hale – President of The Supreme Court; Lord Reed – Deputy President of The Supreme Court; Lady Arden and Lords Wilson, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones and Kitchin. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wlson, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
The Case of Orchard v Lee [2009] EWCA Civ 295 “13 year old boys will be 13 year old boys who will play tag. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:09 am
"He then quoted the authorities, including Baroness Hale in Stack v Dowden, to the effect that proof of payment imports a prima facie obligation to repay upon the recipient, in the absence of any circumstances tending to show anything in the nature of a presumption of advancement, and that there is no presumption of advancement between co-habitants. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
Held: by a majority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale dissenting), allowing the appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
For this reason, Baroness Hale finds the Novacold interpretation was exactly what Parliament intended. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
For this reason, Baroness Hale finds the Novacold interpretation was exactly what Parliament intended. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The Court did not accept the claimant’s arguments that these passages of Lord Hope and Lady Hale in Birmingham v Ali did not apply to the grant of mandatory relief, or that they were limited to situations where suitability was disputed. [read post]
