Search for: "Harmon v. Givens"
Results 281 - 300
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 10:47 am
Given their lack of harmonization, when collective redress mechanisms with different levels of representation are used, the application of the rules on parallel actions can cause procedural chaos. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
The Court found that the then Home Secretary Suella Braverman passed the anti-protest measures in June 2023 despite having not been given the power by Parliament to do so [100]. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:56 pm
Pusateri v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
The author of a critical edition is required to ‘reconstruct’ the meaning of the text and convey the original message, given that such text is likely to be missing ‘pieces’.Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work.Despite (or rather because of?) [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
As such, it must (unsurprisingly) be interpreted in the light of its usual meaning and the context in which it is generally used.Agreeing with the AG, the Court further observed that:that concept refers, in its usual sense, to the fundamental moral values and standards to which a society adheres at a given time. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
Website operators are required to inform users about: (i) cookie retention periods and (ii) whether third parties are given access to the cookies. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the first arguments in the Supreme Court’s October 2021 Term will be in Servotronics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:36 am
This is undoubtedly true, given that the contents of the tweet triggered the charge. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
And in any event, even if such determinations aren't unconstitutional, they seem to me best avoided, for the reasons given above. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Government’s position for the Supreme Court’s review of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:25 am
V. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
These are the same questions at issue in Kirby v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Originally created as a harmonization device. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
