Search for: "Harrington v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
James12-11Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion conflicts with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and this Court's decisions in Harrington v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm by Stephen Page
Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Stephen Page
On the state of the evidence as it stands, it is not open to me to adopt a different valuation or approach from that of either of the experts. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
”  Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 6:08 pm by Stephen Page
The Full Court dismissed the appeal on this point, saying that Justice Rose had not erred in the exercise of discretion.Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm by Stephen Page
The case, Taglieri v Monasky involved a court order for the return of a child who was 2 months when taken from Italy by her mother to the US to be returned to Italy. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
”) At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood writes about a petition that has been relisted twice, Harrington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
Sellers16-6855Issue: Whether the court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm by Josh Blackman
I won't pretend to understand the intricate bankruptcy issues at play in Harrington v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm by Mark Walsh
“I note that memorial drapery has been placed on the door of our courtroom to signify mourning for” O’Connor, the chief justice told a packed courtroom present for oral arguments in the bankruptcy case Harrington v. [read post]