Search for: "Harris v. Clerk of Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Clement argues that a recent ruling by the Supreme Court (Branch v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:20 pm
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:BREAKING NEWS on JUDGE DAVID YOUNG (read below) .....A SCENE FROM A COURTROOM INSIDE THE MJB, CIRCA 1990*** ......JUDGE LNU: Clerk, call the next case.CLERK: State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
The rare winner of a relist-free grant is Harris v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Federal Election Commission, Harris v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
He is a 1988 graduate of the Yale Law School, and a former clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Harris, 13-1313, after the Court took a quick gander at California’s foie gras ban. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The courts that do require subjective intent often rely on the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Virginia v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
But the Court took longer than usual to announce grants after the Long Conference, suggesting that the law clerks fit the final quality control check into the few days before the announcement. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In a surprise to some political observers, on August 11 the California Supreme Court, by a 5-1 vote (the court is temporarily down one member since Justice Kennard’s retirement last spring), decided to block the measure from the ballot, at least for now. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
” In Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
Alito Jr. would have the Court’s opinion in Harris v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
At about 9:50 a.m., Supreme Court Clerk Scott S. [read post]
