Search for: "Hawk v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2019, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Hawks Dismissed * Michael Savage Takedown Letter Might Violate 512(f)–Brave New Media v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm by Mike
Legal Blogs such as Patent Hawk are buzzing because of the Federal Circuit's reversal in Nuance Communication v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Fifty years ago, in a landmark judgment (New York Times v Sullivan), the United States Supreme Court constitutionalised defamation law. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
…and you’ll get something like today’s opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:28 pm by James R. Marsh
Brianna Hawk, one of the students represented in the case stated, "I'm happy that the court has recognized the positive message that The Keep A Breast Foundation is trying to get to the young people. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[4] Matthew Butterick, an attorney for the artists alongside Joseph Saveri noted that the judge “sustained the plaintiffs’ core claim pertaining to direct copyright infringement” and expressed optimism in the claim’s path to trial and the ability to address the court’s concerns.[5] On November 29, 2023, the artists and their legal team submitted an amended complaint, 94 pages to the original complaint’s 44, adding seven artist-plaintiffs: Gerald Brom, Adam… [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 5:54 am by Elina Saxena
The former Secretary of State and presidential candidate outlined her national security plan against the Islamic State in a speech at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
He is a rock-ribbed, super-hawk Republican and has been since he volunteered for Barry Goldwater more than 50 years ago. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
To the extent ROP involves false or misleading attempts to hawk a product, this is just consumer protection law. [read post]