Search for: "Heard v. U. S" Results 281 - 300 of 891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Union of India challenged the award u/s 34 of the Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act), which was dismissed as Part I, including S. 34, was not applicable since the place of arbitration was Kuala Lumpur. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
In another post at E&E News, Gilmer notes that the first case on the new term’s docket, Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Reches v Sack & Sack, LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 31643(U)  June 28, 2018  Supreme Court, Kings County  Docket Number: 511057/2017  Judge: Dawn M. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
The Committee also notes that although judicial notice standards can vary at the state level, many jurisdictions have evidence code provisions that track FRE 201.Applying the Law to Potential Fact PatternsThe Committee goes on to explain that, in light of Rule 2.9, FRE 201, and due process concerns, while judges and those they supervise may independently engage in internet research related to legislative facts, they may not do so with regard to adjudicative facts without notifying the parties and… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:37 pm by Anthony B. Cavender and Amy L. Pierce
On January 22, 2018, the Court issued a unanimous opinion in the Clean Water Act (CWA) case, Nat’l Assoc. of Mfrs. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:31 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Martin In 2001 the Court heard the case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:31 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Martin In 2001 the Court heard the case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
The Court heard oral argument on the Petition on January 3, 2018. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Therefore, the OD decided that the document was not admitted into the proceedings.II.2.3   Should the Technical Expert announced by the PP be allowed to speak:41              By letter of 13.11.2017, the PP had announced Steven Trybus as a TechnicalExpert to be heard during the oral proceedings and indicated that he was an expert in US law. [read post]