Search for: "Hicks v. Hicks"
Results 281 - 300
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2008, 9:20 pm
I've been mulling over the 53 pages of the Virginia Supreme Court's decision in Jaynes v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:09 am
See Hicks v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:35 am
Saratoga County, 234 A.D.2d 764, the Appellate Division said that “persons who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the charges,” citing a number of decisions including Lowy v Carter, 210 AD2d 408, Hicks v Fortier, 117 AD2d 930; and Ortiz v Lesser, 83 AD2d 663. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:12 am
Vía: KM Space [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:12 am
Vía: KM Space [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Saratoga County, 234 A.D.2d 764, the Appellate Division said that "persons who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the charges," citing a number of decisions including Matter of Lowy v Carter, 210 AD2d 408, Matter of Hicks v Fortier, 117 AD2d 930; and Matter of Ortiz v Lesser, 83 AD2d 663. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:26 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in Hicks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:03 am
The plaintiffs argued that the court was bound by its earlier precedent in Hicks v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
In this week’s case (Hicks v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
One example is Hicks v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 11:01 pm
As this court explained in Hicks v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
Hicks, 845 A.2d 1110 (Del. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:46 am
The Court cited Hicks v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 10:31 am
While the plaintiffs cited to Hicks v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 10:05 am
Eastpoint Block A RTM Company Ltd v Otubaga (2022) UKUT 319 (LC) Eastpoint are a right to manage company for a block of flats. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:05 am
Hicks, 539 U.S. 113, 121 (2003) (internal citations omitted). [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
Bowers, 706 F.2d 1202 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court cited the general rule of Hick v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
Hicks, 438 Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
(More disclosure: I am also one of the lawyers for David Hicks). [read post]
