Search for: "High v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 31,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
See State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:59 am
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, involves a federal disability claimant who dropped out of high school in the 11th grade. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:52 am
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, claimant graduated from high school in 2003. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
In, United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 8:24 am
Wade; Even if the high court ultimately rules that the Texas law is unconstitutional, it has already allowed the state to pursue measures that shutter clinics”: Law professor Leah Litman has this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States... [read post]
25 May 2009, 3:34 pm
Surprisingly, it appears to be telling a High Court not to follow the Supreme Court's ruling in Parkash Singh Badal v State of Punjab (2006) which created two small exceptions to impunity provisions. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:51 am
Prest v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:41 am
Here is the opinion in Scott v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:15 am
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition for Certiorari in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:51 am
Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Janus v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Addison v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
At 10 a.m. on Tuesday, the Supreme Court will again review the constitutional rules for high-speed police chases, in the case of Plumhoff v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:43 am
The state high court in reaching this conclusion relied on the 1988 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:05 pm
6-15-2010 Ohio:The State and the Ohio Attorney General ask the high court to look again at its decision in State v Bodyke, because it seems to contain ambiguities.In the original decision the court held that, it was a violation of the Separations of Powers clause of the Ohio constitution for the Attorney General to reclassify offenders (registrants, they are no longer offenders) who once were [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:07 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:00 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
