Search for: "Hollingsworth v. Perry"
Results 281 - 300
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
If the Court limits itself to deciding the precise constitutional issues presented in both cases, it will not have definitively resolved the question of whether a ban on same sex marriage is unconstitutional.In Hollingsworth v Perry, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that where the California Constitution was interpreted by the Supreme Court of California as guaranteeing the right to marry to opposite-sex and same-sex couples… [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:23 am
Windsor, which struck down the Defense of Marriage Act's ("DOMA") definition of marriage for the purposes of federal law, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:52 pm
The petition in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
Such an outcome mirrors Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Perry, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court on March 27, 2013—the day after arguments were heard in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Additionally, the High Court dismissed the companion same-sex marriage case, Hollingsworth v Perry, holding that the proponents of California’s “Proposition 8,” which amended the state constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, lacked standing to appeal a federal district court’s ruling that the ballot initiative was unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
The same day, the Court also issued an opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Last month’s ruling by the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
Verrilli has already made one choice about the “Proposition 8″ case (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm
The Court in that case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
Last June, in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm
Hearing oral argument on March 26, in Hollingsworth v Perry (Dkt No 12-144), the Court faced the question of whether California’s Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, is constitutional. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
Perry, docket 12-144). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Gavin Newsom of California, who is in the public gallery as he was two years ago for Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(Roberts invoked standing in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
In a companion case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
Hollingsworth v. [read post]
