Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am
App. 3d 735, 586 N.E.2d 679 (1991); see also State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:03 am
This blog has reported on many decisions in which the California Court of Appeal reversed a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to introduce meaningful evidence of the defendant's financial condition. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:09 am
Such was the case in Sundin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 2:22 pm
Even though Holmes made many bad decisions (including Buck v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm
Trump v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:56 am
I'm certainly glad this aspect is being highlighted, but Grits wishes the bill went farther.The ill-considered codification of Holmes v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm
., V&R unipress, 2023). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm
., V&R unipress, 2023). [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm
Trump v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm
Trump v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm
Trump v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
Holmes treated Carrie Buck's constitutional claims with contempt. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
One such case in which cert was denied, as noted by SCOTUSblog, was a "test of the constitutionality of the death penalty procedures in the state of Louisiana (Holmes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
Holmes et. al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:27 pm
In the case of Holmes v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
The case, People v Holmes, involved a high-profile defendant in a criminal case (the person who shot up the Colorado movie theatre – allegedly), but these cases should not turn on whether the person claiming a privacy right is sympathetic. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Of the Supreme Court Justices, only Justice Holmes opposed traditional jurisprudence and favored sociological jurisprudence.Part III of this Article contends that the Court had previously implicitly adopted the principles of sociological jurisprudence in the context of race in Plessy v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm
Mueller, Emily Burkhardt Vicente and Evangeline Paschal and local Baird Holm lawyer, Thomas E. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 11:27 am
With the usual Kent Brockman caution that "only time will tell," yesterday's argument probably means that Roe v. [read post]
