Search for: "Holt v. May"
Results 281 - 300
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The claim was in any event also for 'such shares as the court may decide' and always subject to M's right to reside. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:57 am
Holt decision was released on May 28, 2010 from the Court of the Queen’s Bench of Alberta in Calgary. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority.It may, however, sometimes be advantageous for the appointing authority to wait until the criminal matter has been adjudicated. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
In Kent and Elizabeth Hizer v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
App. at 444 (citing Ben Holt Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
To cap it all there was even Brian Blessed doing a good impression of Brian Blessed reciting the famous bit from Henry V: “Cry God for Fabio England and St George”, before our gallant lads took on the might of, er, Slovenia. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
School Dist., 52 NY2d 625.In Holt the Court of Appeals said that letters in an employee's personnel file commenting on that employee's conduct or performance that the employer found unsatisfactory did not constitute discipline. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:57 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
In Cross v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:00 am
Holt, 1994 WL 503891, at *2. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 am
The book will be available about May 1, 2010. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am
In fact, this guidance may very well have been issued as a result of those actions, particularly SEC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:21 am
Pendergest-Holt v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:36 am
Pendergest-Holt v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
